Charlotte Street Fund - Home
Awards to Visual Artists
Awards to Generative Performing Artists
Urban Culture Project
Visual Arts Consortium
Advisors & Contributors
Creative Capital Professional Development Workshops for Artists
KC Artist LINC
10 - Charlotte Street Foundation's 10th Anniversary Book
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
2000


Since its beginning in 1997, the Charlotte Street Foundation has recognized and awarded over $70,000 to twenty—two artists and presented exhibitions of their work throughout Kansas City. The fourth annual Charlotte Street Foundation 2000 exhibition features the work of six outstanding visual artists working in Kansas City: Tom Gregg, Adriane Herman, Peregrine Honig, Warren Rosser, Jesse Small and James Woodfill.

While considering the artists at hand, five fundamental motifs emerged: industry, physicality, labor, meditation and message. By industry, it is meant that the artist demonstrates a particular admiration for the timeless values of strenuous mechanical activity. Physicality refers to the evidence of execution— the mark of the artist—and labor denotes the signs of meticulous work. Meditation indicates an especially introspective look at the nature of art-making, while message marks a concern for examining concrete subjects.

Of course these elements are important to all six artists, as are many other rewarding aspects these five motifs do not address. But by attending to some of the elements that seem most striking, I hope to honor each artist's unique perspective. At the same time, these themes offer ways in which to view the works on display.

Warren Rosser
In the realms of industry physicality and meditation Warren Rosser has been a leader for some thirty years. His work since late 1998 returns to his earlier love of painting, after a long series of three-dimensional painting-and-construction works of the 1980s and early 1990s. Rosser's enthusiasm for paint can be heard in his praise of Golden brand acrylics ("You open a jar and you want to lick it"), yet the discipline of painting is problematic. Herein lies his current contributions to industry, physicality and meditation: not content with the results from paint brushes (he sees them as "too predictable"), Rosser now uses the less-familiar poetics of squeegee and stencil to provide an objective distance, removing complacency from his work. The large works are painted by walking around them on the floor. Rosser rakes his squeegee over the hammer-like stenciled components in the foreground while both they and the background are wet, thereby collapsing space in broken swipes of color. The resulting connotations of erratic movement speak of earth-moving machines with wheels off-track; projected film images rattling through a misfeed; or out of register four-color print jobs, as if to lament the passing of the analog era.

Jesse Small
Jesse Small shares Rosser's interests in industry and physicality while orienting himself toward conveying a message. In addition to working in clay, Small often uses a plasma cutter to incise gorgeous looping lines and floral shapes into steel. He borrows forms directly from the military: metal plates with cut-outs echo the outline of Stealth bombers and army helmets become carved to look like lace. This clash of macho sources and unabashed beauty forms the heart of Small's aesthetics of juxtaposition. He seeks out helmets from the Vietnam era, though he was born when the war was over; some of his arabesques derive from Vietnamese currency, while others begin as U.S. camouflage patterns; his artworks themselves signify sophistication, while the subject of war embodies barbarism. These contradictions focus attention on the larger implications of Small's art: by combining and mixing images of Southeast Asia and the U.S., he reminds us that the Vietnam War still deserves recognition and reconciliation. In doing so, younger Americans learn that such conflicts affect all of us, not just soldiers, and that one can be a patriot and still protest war—potentially a timely message in this era of U.N.-sponsored police acts.

Peregrine Honig
Physicality and message are integral to the drawings of Peregrine Honig as well. The pen, ink and gouache she uses cannot be erased, permitting only a single pass to render likenesses credibly. Her linear style echoes this sure-handedness and feels familiar: we are drawn to it with happy memories of cartoons from youth, though they did not touch on subjects such as sex. Or did they, only in a veiled way? In this, one locates the crux of Honig's concerns - querying the construction of female identity. For her current body of work she conducted cultural research at a college sorority and by viewing pornography and visiting a strip club. Honig discovered that both cultures raise provocative questions about womanhood. What makes a woman want to be accepted into a sorority, and what will she do for that acceptance? Why does a girl decide to be wild, and where will this wildness lead her? Why do women dress up for each other and how does this compare to why they dress up for men? What makes a pair of identical twins want to pose nude together? When does this all begin? In. the end, Honig's drawings attract through their ambivalence, as bittersweet as blosson-ting sexuality itself.

Adriane Herman
Adriane Herman diverges somewhat from the physicality of Rosser, Small and Honig. Her brush strokes and collaged sections appear textured and corporeal, but in reality her prints are labor-intensive "virtually physical" meditations on art and life. Herman painstakingly paints and collages small tableaux that often incorporate depictions of food and domestic scenes. Sometimes, as for this show, she digitizes this entire product using a flatbed scanner and manipulates portions of it with a computer, combining and recombining fragments from her oeuvre with illustrations and text culled from old books. Herman then uses a Piezo inkjet printer to output the final form, a dialog between digital and analog that often departs from her starting point. Her ostensible subject matter is the often-humorous non-linear narrative that results from mixing and matching bits of pictures and words, but in her view her underlying content is decision-making. How do we choose what to include and what to discard in lives inundated by images and information? Herman's delectable prints and a new body of work inspired by game boards celebrate non-linear approaches to life's unknowns. As she quips, "John Cage had the I Ching. I've got a plastic spinner."

Tom Gregg
Work ethic and meditations on art-making are also important ingredients in the art of Tom Gregg. Observation plays a key role in realizing these ends: as Gregg says, he has never gotten over the excitement of carefully crafting a still-life that resembles its model. To be sure, the portraits of cherries, apples, oranges and so forth in the front of his compositions reward the eye with their vitality and convincing three-dimensionality. But these paintings are "about" much more than still-life. Instead, they seem more like explorations of the act of observation, the art of painting and its history. These rich layers can be mined in Gregg's backgrounds, which exist in a flatter picture space not intended to project like his foregrounds. One's view flickers fore and aft so that pictorial space constantly collapses and is reborn, as if each picture is a metaphor for the history of Modernist painting - but with a wily spirit that evokes Postmodernism. Gregg's images enable more specific connec­tions with modern Euro-American art history. His fruit, ashtrays, knives, guns, etc. remind one of Pop art's everyday objects. A Pop presence has permeated his backdrops also in recent years (along with Neo-expressionist tendencies), but for this exhibition Gregg has produced impressive pared-down works more in the vein of color-field abstractions.

James Woodfill
A meditative disposition can be found again in the sculpture of James Woodfill, while his occupation with industry and movement brings the exhibition full circle to Warren Rosser. Woodfill has become well-known for oscillating works like these light-emitting metal drums that, despite their apparent complexity, are delight­fully simple. A small electric motor turns a heavy rod that swings the barrel to life. No two cylinders rotate in the same fashion or throw light and shadows in the same direction. The deeper meaning of individuality becomes apparent as a drum starts up after being switched on or bumped. Each wobbles eccentrically until finding its harmonic resonance, a principle Woodfill borrows from physics to describe the unique identifying characteristics of a barrel's spin. A number of factors determine the harmonic resonance, such as the motor's speed and weight and length of the turning rod (which are both fixed), and variables that the artist "tunes:" the height of the peg lifting the drum from the floor and the amount of steel he cuts out from a barrel. In effect, Woodfill's singular creatures are elegant artificial life forms, a charming species that encourages us to greet intricacies like biology and computer technology with the wide-eyed sense of wonder that they deserve.

Ultimately, the 2000 Charlotte Street Foundation recipients portray visual art in the city as quite healthy. Although they were not necessarily meant to serve as a cross-section, these six artists personify the admixture of diversity and cross-pollinating that distinguishes lively art scenes across the country.

—James Martin